tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3719024566754743654.post6213282311213613507..comments2010-02-08T17:03:09.999-05:00MikeShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10978313265796058909mbsu@verizon.netBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3719024566754743654.post-34023854467949205802010-02-08T17:03:09.999-05:002010-02-08T17:03:09.999-05:00Indeed. I would hypothesize that it might be the collective consciousness, and all the shadows within, that projects those shadows outward into a manifest world. <br />Problem is... these shadows are as deeply embedded in the collective mind as in the individual localized consciousness. <br />And nobody really wants to go there...<br /><br />Thanks!<br />mikeSMikeShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10978313265796058909noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3719024566754743654.post-22520071959747582022010-02-07T08:00:32.694-05:002010-02-07T08:00:32.694-05:00well - i loved this article too, exactly what i think the problem was/is with integrals approach<br /><br />imight add that even though iunderstand that it may be distasteful to many, including myself, to suggest that the victims of say hitler, darfur, and more recently haiti thoughts caused their situation, <br /><br />just because it is distasteful doesnt actually dispprove the theorem, while i find the concept horrid, it is true that there was a lot of pain and history of victimhood in these areas - which you could certainly argue produced negative thoughts,emotions and, if the law of attraction is true, could have caused very negative outcomes.<br /><br />now, i am not saying this is true, just saying that you find that distasteful, doesnt automatically disqualify the rationality behind the ideaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3719024566754743654.post-75090800608873550472009-05-20T15:51:23.305-04:002009-05-20T15:51:23.305-04:00What is the secret that "The Secret" failed to unveil??? Great article by the way.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com