tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3719024566754743654.post4306167213940314575..comments2011-12-07T19:39:45.375-05:00mikehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10978313265796058909noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3719024566754743654.post-66830685570078720032011-12-07T19:39:45.375-05:002011-12-07T19:39:45.375-05:00The discomfort is fear. What are you afraid will be exposed? or is the fear more about the response your exposure might engender? High Mojo will inevitably require excruciating honesty.<br /><br />Mojo is always between people and that exchange generates either high or low levels of Mojo. Estrangement is just the maintenance of low Mojo.<br /><br />We are so deeply connected already, but we choose to be unconscious of that connection in fear that they may learn what we think about ourselves (and then think the same).<br /><br />It seems to me the ultimate goal is complete invulnerability which is emblematic of our conceptual conditions gradually dropping away.<br /><br />Thanks,<br />mikeSmikehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10978313265796058909noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3719024566754743654.post-68214194606457802442011-12-07T08:46:09.460-05:002011-12-07T08:46:09.460-05:00I quite liked this post.<br />do you think sharing your world is the same as giving off high mojo? often times this sharing leads to intense feelings of discomfort in myself and me perceiving discomfort in the person i am sharing with. this is especially true if i try to share with them my concept of them, which i feel is fraught with judgements, jealousies, and other negative feelings. is this just something one must do before they can share mojo more efficiently? can mojo really be shared or given off between two people who are strangers/alienated?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com