tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3719024566754743654.post2499943535136392826..comments2009-06-03T10:18:49.412-04:00mikehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10978313265796058909noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3719024566754743654.post-54708156716489439202009-06-03T10:18:49.412-04:002009-06-03T10:18:49.412-04:00Christine,<br /><br />If &quot;another human&quot; is a construct of your interior experience, wouldn&#39;t you benefit from fully joining with that experience since, if it is your experience, than it must be &quot;you&quot;?<br /><br />It seems likely to me that engaging with the parts of experience cut off from self, but that mimic the self, would best bring one into full engagement with the &quot;experience&quot; of primordial essence. <br /><br />Just saying...<br />mikeSMikeShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10978313265796058909noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3719024566754743654.post-55372571791855428532009-06-02T12:41:07.701-04:002009-06-02T12:41:07.701-04:00hi mike<br />enjoyed your post.<br /><br />i would agree that the experience of deep spirit cannot be experienced alone - however, there does not have to be another human present - the other, with whom/what relates can be simply be the nature of separateness as it arises. i don't believe, through my own experience, which is not simply all conceptual, that i need another human to realize primordial essence - but indeed, there IS a relating - whether it be human, or not...<br />more later perhaps<br />love to you<br />christinearpitahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03104673218514262727noreply@blogger.com